Hello, Africa!
Boere activist Dries Kriel, who has spent his life's work dedicated to the cause of the Boerevolk, speaks about his effort to turn May 1st from a Communist Holiday into a volksdag, and the Boere's plans to rally together against the Communist-ANC's plans to deface the Women's Monument in Bloomfontein.Right Click and "Save As..." to Download
4 comments:
The Jew has been in Palestine for only 60 years the Boer in South Africa for 360 years just as the Americans, Australians and New Zealanders have been master in their nations.
Only the Boers and later the Afrikaner are vilified and forced to hand over all that was so humbly and justly achieved having never enslaved or placed bounties on human life.
How is it possible that Israel is recognised by most nations around the world?
Money, Money and more Money is what drives politicians like De Klerk, Clinton and others to Betray their wives, family and countrymen.
Incorruptible leaders like Julius Caesar, Hendrik Verwoerd or Abraham Lincoln had to be murdered in order to stop their rational & popular leadership.
Yet, The Truth Shall Always Set You Free.
Rhodesia and South Africa will rise again from the ashes of zimbabwean and azanian savagery.
It is great that these communists have changed all the Civilised names of old. Such as Lourenco Marques to maputo, Salisbury to harare and Pretoria to thswane.
Making it so much easier to distinguish when our societies prospered and when they seized to be civilised.
When the storm has passed and the diseases of lifestyle, immorality and ignorance have cleansed our nations, then the names can simply be reinstated.
Mother Nature takes care of so much.
Soli Deo Gloria!
The following is a speech delivered by Prime Minister Verwoerd to the South African Parliament on February Third, 1960
The tendency in Africa for nations to become independent, and at the same time to do justice to all, does not only mean being just to the black man of Africa, but also to be just to the white man of Africa.
We call ourselves European, but actually we represent the white men of Africa.
They are the people not only in the Union but through major portions of Africa who brought civilisation here, who made the present developments of black nationalists possible.
By bringing them education, by showing them this way of life, by bringing in industrial development, by bringing in the ideals which western civilisation has developed itself.
The white man came to Africa, perhaps to trade, in some cases, to bring the gospel; has remained to stay. And particularly we in this southern most portion of Africa, have such a stake here that this is our only motherland, we have no where else to go.
We set up a country bare, and the Bantu came to this country and settled certain portions for themselves, and it is in line with the thinking of Africa, to grant those fullest rights which we also with you admit all people should have and believe providing those rights for those people in the fullest degree in that part of southern Africa which their forefathers found for themselves and settled in.
But similarly, we believe in balance, we believe in allowing exactly those same full opportunities to remain within the grasp of the white man who has made all this possible.
For Further Insight visit:
http://hendrikverwoerd.blogspot.com
The Boer Republics were indeed recognized by other countries as Dries Kriel correctly mentioned on the program. The Transvaal Republic (Zuid Afrikaansche Republiek) & the Orange Free State were recognized by several European governments & the American government.
< The Republic was now in possession of a Convention, which from the nature of its provisions seemed to promise a peaceful future. In addition to Great Britain it was recognized in Holland, France, Germany, Belgium, and especially in the United States of America. The American Secretary of State at Washington, writing to President Pretorius on the 19th November, 1870, said: "That his Government, while heartily acknowledging the Sovereignty of the Transvaal Republic, would be ready to take any steps which might be deemed necessary for that purpose." >
From: The Story of the Boers.
The full article to the text posted on Konrad Kruger's blog noting the difference between Apartheid & Separate Development (which aimed at ending the neo colonial horizontal features of the system) can be found at:
Apartheid and Separate Development. From: Johann Wingard.
Though the main problem was the centralized State that Britain created with the South Africa Act of 1909. A state which was formed out of the conquered two Boer Republics in the north & the two British colonies in the south. It is interesting to note that the two largest groups of Bantus were the Xhosas in the eastern Cape (where the Transkei & the Ciskei had been granted independence) & the Zulus in Natal.
Most of the Bantu people in the former Boer Republics came from the regions to the south (& elsewhere) after the discovery of gold when the British magnates & mine owners brought them to work in the mines.
While there were a few scattered Bantus groups within the boundaries of the Boers Republics following the Great Trek: they were very small in number & most of those specific groups (ie: the Venda & North Sotho) are today still rather small in number.
This is why many Boers feel that they have the legal right to restore their former republics in the north -but they might only be able to do so through the adoption of a system of government which can function in co-existence with the numerous (formerly immigrant) Bantus who have since taken up permanent residence in the region.
The Boer people just require to get some security over the dire situation they are facing -such as the escalation farm murders / attacks & the oppression they are experiencing from the macro South African State- which could most certainly be alleviated within some form of restored independence & or self government.
The Boer Republics were indeed recognized by other countries as Dries Kriel correctly mentioned on the program. The Transvaal Republic (Zuid Afrikaansche Republiek) & the Orange Free State were recognized by several European governments & the American government.
< The Republic was now in possession of a Convention, which from the nature of its provisions seemed to promise a peaceful future. In addition to Great Britain it was recognized in Holland, France, Germany, Belgium, and especially in the United States of America. The American Secretary of State at Washington, writing to President Pretorius on the 19th November, 1870, said: "That his Government, while heartily acknowledging the Sovereignty of the Transvaal Republic, would be ready to take any steps which might be deemed necessary for that purpose." >
From: The Story of the Boers.
The full article to the text posted on Konrad Kruger's blog noting the difference between Apartheid & Separate Development (which aimed at ending the neo colonial horizontal features of the system) can be found at:
Apartheid and Separate Development. From: Johann Wingard.
Though the main problem was the centralized State that Britain created with the South Africa Act of 1909. A state which was formed out of the conquered two Boer Republics in the north & the two British colonies in the south. It is interesting to note that the two largest groups of Bantus were the Xhosas in the eastern Cape (where the Transkei & the Ciskei had been granted independence) & the Zulus in Natal.
Most of the Bantu people in the former Boer Republics came from the regions to the south (& elsewhere) after the discovery of gold when the British magnates & mine owners brought them to work in the mines.
While there were a few scattered Bantus groups within the boundaries of the Boers Republics following the Great Trek: they were very small in number & most of those specific groups (ie: the Venda & North Sotho) are today still rather small in number.
This is why many Boers feel that they have the legal right to restore their former republics in the north -but they might only be able to do so through the adoption of a system of government which can function in co-existence with the numerous (formerly immigrant) Bantus who have since taken up permanent residence in the region.
The Boer people just require to get some security over the dire situation they are facing -such as the escalation farm murders / attacks & the oppression they are experiencing from the macro South African State- which could most certainly be alleviated within some form of restored independence & or self government.
There is another interesting article dealing with the topic of the different forms of Apartheid called: Tribes & Nations.
Click here for an archived link.
The following in an excerpt.
< Thus, Apartheid was part and parcel of the South African social structure long before the Afrikaner took power – in actual fact apartheid was politically introduced by the British in the Act of Union in 1910.
Then, in 1994, ostrich view and cowardice by the citizenry has allowed a handful of traitors and collaborators to give our land, the Republic of South Africa, away to a Marxist Communist Regime.. That is the land which the Sand River Convention of 1852 and the Bloemfontein Convention of 1854 gave us -- namely the Transvaal and the Orange Free State.
There are two kinds of 'apartheid'. The one is close to the kind as seen and described by the mass media, and it certainly has elements of oppression in it for non-citizens, - though light-years away from the horribly nasty opprobrium attached to it by them. This 'false apartheid', similar to the concept of 'petty apartheid' coined in the sixties, was the result of a move away from the real apartheid (=separateness) by Dr Verwoerd's successors, who wanted to have their cake (ie live separately) and eat it, too (ie still have blacks to wipe their backsides for them). From John Vorster's time (1966) until de Klerk in 1994, that is the kind of false apartheid pushed by the ruling National Party. How far it was just incompetence and stupidity, and how far it was the result of subversion and treason (Pik Botha, the Minister of Foreign Affairs definitely falls into the latter category), we'll never know. The result, in any case, was the same : SA got all the flak from the anti-apartheid propaganda, without gaining any benefits an implementation of real apartheid would have given (ie a white homeland).
The real, so-called 'grand apartheid', was persued by Dr Hedrik Vewoerd. Maybe not as quickly as he would have liked, but still he used the power of the state to genuinely build up and free the different black nations, with the ultimate aim of having a white-majority smaller, but whiter SA left for us, the white South Africans. Because he was incorruptible and competent, he had to go. Because he became too popular to oust in an election, he had to be murdered. The first attempt failed, (he recovered), the second succeeded. Until his death, he had progressed so far on the road of the true apartheid, a constellation of free, but interdependent states in SA, that it took his successors more than three decades to destroy the apartheid framework he laid down. Eventually, independent black states like Bophutatswana and the Ciskei had to be dismantled by force, while the white nation had to be deceived and hoodwinked, step by step, in a most elaborate programme and through a host of different operations.
There was never any real Apartheid as the laws were simply a dishonest attempt at creating Apartheid at some point in the future which was abandoned in steps after Verwoerd was assassinated in 1966. The type of Apartheid Verwoerd was attempting to create was a sort of Vertical Apartheid (ie: separate & independent countries in the sub continent as per Canada & the USA within North America) while the type of Apartheid which existed in South Africa was a sort of Horizontal Apartheid with its oppressive (due to the coercive power of the British created unitary macro State enforcing centralized laws) consequences.
Post a Comment